Picture this: there’s a sales leader who thrived in a different era of selling—when relationships, a full Rolodex, and a great golf game could carry the quarter. He built a strong career on that model.
But today’s environment looks different. The tools and processes that power modern revenue teams feel foreign to him.
Meanwhile, his marketing team is fully dialed in, generating qualified leads, creating content that educates and converts, and feeding a data-driven funnel. They’re operating in a motion built for how buyers make decisions now.
But he’s still relying on the playbook that worked years ago. He’s not comfortable in HubSpot, isn’t sure how to collaborate with a modern marketing engine, and doesn’t have a clear sense of where leads are coming from or how to follow up with them strategically.
In leadership meetings, that disconnect can morph into a narrative that sales are down because “marketing isn’t delivering enough good leads.”
It’s not that he’s unwilling or isn’t working hard. But the sales motion he mastered no longer translates to the way growth happens today. And when the person presenting the data is doing so through an old lens, the whole story can get distorted.
The Accountability Problem
When sales owns a firm’s marketing function, accountability breaks down entirely. The organization loses clarity about what’s happening in the funnel, and marketing becomes the scapegoat for sales teams that aren’t delivering.
I’ve built my entire career on the unshakeable belief that marketing needs a real seat at the table. A healthy business depends on productive tension between sales and marketing; it’s the tension that creates balance.
Both sides need Service Level Agreements that answer these questions:
- What counts as a qualified lead?
- How many leads will marketing deliver?
- How many opportunities will sales convert?
- What does the handoff process look like?
Data needs to be shared transparently at the leadership level so everyone is operating from the same reality.
Navigating an Agency Partnership
Sales shouldn’t own the marketing function period, whether it’s an in-house team, an outsourced agency partnership, or some combination of the two. With sales at the helm of an agency relationship, the same accountability issues arise.
I’ve seen our team pressured to chase short-term lead volume instead of building sustainable growth. Blamed for a lack of demos booked when half the sales team was on vacation. Scapegoated when results are lackluster because fresh campaigns haven’t been reviewed and approved.
Ideally, an in-house marketing lead owns the agency relationship. They understand the strategy, the timelines, and the metrics that matter. In the absence of an internal team, the firm’s CEO should be involved in and very aware of the relationship, holding both sales and the agency equally accountable for results.
CEOs: This One’s on You
I’ve talked a lot about sales and marketing, but leadership needs to be deeply involved in understanding what both functions are doing.
When your salesperson claims marketing isn’t delivering, stop. Dig into the data. Ask hard questions:
- Where’s the actual breakdown?
- Is engagement low?
- Is interest weak?
- Are the leads poor quality?
- Are the opportunities not converting?
- Or is everything working fine and the problem is effort, the actual push to close?
Don’t let one side control the narrative. Look at the full funnel.
Build a More Inclusive Table
Full disclosure: I’m biased. I spent my career as a CMO. Now I sit in a seat where I do more sales than marketing, but I’ve watched this pattern play out too many times. It’s outdated, it’s destructive, and it needs to end.
CEOs, arm yourself with better information. Ask better questions. Make sure marketing and sales have equal seats at the table. That’s how you build a growth engine that actually works.